Trainer Performance Rankings

This infographic provides a detailed performance breakdown of all trainers, ranked quarterly and annually. Each trainer's score is calculated based on a weighted average of several metrics, including class completion rates, training ratings, and project hours. Use the icon next to a trainer's name to generate a personalized AI-powered performance summary for that quarter. Additionally, some trainers receive an impact driver bonus (indicated by a icon) for exceptional contributions, which applies a multiplier to their quarterly score.

Scoring Methodology
Class Completion5%
Training Rating15%
Training Effectiveness25%
In-Class Hours15%
Project Time15%
Recursive Training10%
Self-Dev Hours5%
T3 Hours5%

Q1 (Sept - Nov '24)

Top Performers

Johnson, Micguel

86.19

Contreras, Michelle

+10%
80.07

Perez, Andrew

79.89

Colon, Emmanuel

78.72

Forbs, Candace

73.80

Mid-Tier Performers

Glasgow, Amaris

67.53

Stewart, Gina

66.18

Behel, Kelli

65.91

Severance, Kara

61.87

Gregoire, Nathalie

59.37

Zubler, Emily

52.94

Lowest-Tier Performers

Johnson, Tocarra

44.16

Gallacher, Vanessa

39.51

Gonzalez, Kenny

+10%
37.07

Handelman, Allyson

0.00

Q2 (Dec '24 - Feb '25)

Top Performers

Johnson, Tocarra

+40%
106.21

Gregoire, Nathalie

+20%
101.47

Contreras, Michelle

+20%
82.46

Colon, Emmanuel

+10%
76.51

Stewart, Gina

+30%
74.84

Perez, Andrew

+10%
72.08

Mid-Tier Performers

Johnson, Micguel

+10%
69.66

Severance, Kara

67.84

Zubler, Emily

62.14

Gallacher, Vanessa

61.68

Glasgow, Amaris

59.83

Gonzalez, Kenny

54.55

Lowest-Tier Performers

Handelman, Allyson

+10%
53.95

Behel, Kelli

+10%
44.22

Forbs, Candace

38.72

Skahill, Taryn

4.00

Potoczny, Don

2.80

Q3 (Mar - May '25)

Top Performers

Gonzalez, Kenny

+20%
100.29

Severance, Kara

+10%
94.65

Contreras, Michelle

+30%
94.28

Zubler, Emily

+10%
92.01

Colon, Emmanuel

+40%
86.44

Stewart, Gina

+10%
79.60

Mid-Tier Performers

Gregoire, Nathalie

75.20

Perez, Andrew

+10%
74.88

Johnson, Tocarra

+50%
74.80

Glasgow, Amaris

+10%
72.38

Johnson, Micguel

66.80

Handelman, Allyson

+40%
65.57

Lowest-Tier Performers

Behel, Kelli

62.79

Gallacher, Vanessa

+10%
52.80

Potoczny, Don

+10%
48.82

Forbs, Candace

45.54

Skahill, Taryn

42.90

Overall Performance Q1-Q3: Most Impactful Trainers

You may notice some mid-tier performers ranking highly; this is due to their significant impact on the team, which is factored into their overall scores. Several of the trainers who have lower scores are not lower performers but are actually just new to the role and not underperforming. The performance bands are structured to align with our bell curve methodology.

Top Performers

Contreras, Michelle

85.60

Colon, Emmanuel

80.56

Gregoire, Nathalie

78.68

Perez, Andrew

75.62

Mid-Tier Performers

Johnson, Tocarra

75.06

Severance, Kara

74.79

Johnson, Micguel

74.22

Stewart, Gina

73.54

Zubler, Emily

69.03

Gonzalez, Kenny

63.97

Behel, Kelli

57.64

Handelman, Allyson

39.84

Potoczny, Don

17.21

Skahill, Taryn

15.63

Lowest-Tier Performers

Gallacher, Vanessa

51.33

Forbs, Candace

52.68

Glasgow, Amaris

66.58

Trend Analysis & Key Insights

Top 5 Best In-Class Trainers
Based on Rating, Effectiveness, & Completion.
1

Colon, Emmanuel

6.56

2

Stewart, Gina

6.37

3

Contreras, Michelle

5.68

4

Zubler, Emily

5.27

5

Severance, Kara

5.00

Most Consistent

Contreras, Michelle

In top performance band all 3 quarters

High-Impact Performer

Gregoire, Nathalie

Led Q1 in Training Effectiveness (5)

FY26 Implementations
  • Add Manager: Trainer Performance Evaluations
  • Add Retention Rates//Attrition Rates by Trainer